|
 |
|
|
|
 JEW ON DEMAND
Nennt Gudrun Eussner Noam Chomsky, der Professor auf Lebenszeit am MIT, Alibijude aller Linken, Amerika und Israelhasser und Michael Moore der Gebildeten, die den Dativ vom Genitiv trennen können. Chomsky, dieser Superdemagoge, der sich leider
nicht auf seine kommunikations- und politikwissenschaftlichen Arbeiten beschränkt, sondern seine zum Teil richtigen Analysen der Meinungsmanipulation selbst ganz trefflich anwendet und in den Dienst seiner Perspektiven stellt und sich deshalb eigentlich Ahmadinejad als Propagandaminister andienen könnte, wird ständig und wurde immer
gewürdigt. Abgesehen von rein wissenschaftlichen Besprechungen, meistens kritiklos von den Linken, Palästinenserfreunden und Islamverstehern und kritisch von Beobachtern wie Broder und Eussner. Wer nach Chomsky googelt kann lt.
Eussner insgesamt 128 000 Ergebnisse erhalten (in Verbindung mit dem Wort Terror.)
Soviel Zeit habe ich nicht, aber ich habe wenigstens einen interessanten Abschnitt entdeckt auf der Seite von Ready Steady Books. Da gibt es einen Artikel von Chris Knight:
"He (Chris Knight) is a professor of anthropology at the University of East London, and the author of the highly acclaimed and controversial book, Blood Relations: Menstruation and The Origins of Culture, which outlines a new theory of human origins. Chris
gives regular talks at the Radical Anthropology Group in London, and will also be speaking at the Communist University in London in August. Chris was talking to regular RSB contributor Stuart Watkins and Dave Flynn."
Chris Knight schreibt an einer Stelle, mehr zur Mitte des Artikels:
"The problem is that Chomsky's separation of science and politics is a myth. His own science - his linguistics - is political through and through. Chomsky defines language as not social. He defines it as an object inside the individual head. He says it doesn't have any special communicative
function - mostly, we use language just for privately thinking to ourselves. He says that the meanings of words are not socially negotiated but wired into the brain in advance as features of the human genome. In my view, to say all this is pure nonsense - stark, raving nonsense. But it is not politically neutral nonsense. To argue for such
far-fetched positions is is to adopt an ideological stance - that of the liberal bourgeoisie. Chomsky is the most virulent imaginable opponent of social science in general and of Marxism in particular. Since the late 1950s, bourgeois hostility towards Marxism in western intellectual life has found its most extreme and articulate champion in
Noam Chomsky.
Conversely, it is a myth to say that Chomsky's political activism is unconnected with his science. The connection is intimate. Today's most imaginative and effective political activists are constantly engaged with the findings of environmental scientists, earth scientists, economists, anthropologists, historians and others. Could we
even imagine today's environmentalist movement without the brilliant environmental science which lies behind it? Against this background, it is positively uncanny to find how little science appears in Chomsky's writings as a political critic. We find no economic analyses, no sociological analyses, no application of theories or findings from
any part of the social sciences or humanities. All we find are quotes from newspapers or reports of various kinds, telling a journalistic story. I personally tend to find Chomsky's stories accurate - more accurate than most. I admire his political integrity and courage. But I am suspicious about Chomsky's overall role. My view is that the
ruling class are perfectly happy to have Chomsky writing this kind of thing. It doesn't frighten them in the least because it doesn't threaten them - Chomsky goes out of his way to construct and represent himself as a lone voice. In particular, when wearing his activist hat, he ostentatiously removes his scientific one. What would upset the
ruling class would be the reverse strategy. What would upset them would be for the world community of scientists to become active while the activists became scientific. Our two communities might then hope to converge on a shared language of self-emancipation and revolutionary change. Chomsky has devoted his life to obstructing any such
development. This is why I think he should be overthrown."
Noam Chomsky ist ein Wissenschaftler der seine Arbeitsergebnisse in den Dienst einer Ideologie
stellt. Damit ist er nicht weit entfernt von Wissenschaftlern die die Ergebnisse ihrer Forschung aus der Anwendung der Milzbrandbakterien zur Herstellung von Biobomben einer freiheitsfeindlichen Macht zur Verfügung stellen. Sollten wir froh sein, daß er "bloß" Linguist ist? Oder kann er als Demagoge, der unsere idealistische
Jugend beeinflußt, vielleicht mehr Schaden anrichten? Links: Eussner,
Broder, Chris Knight, Telepolis,
Ready Steady |
|
|
|
 Antisemitismus ist nicht nur rechts...
Broder nicht zu lesen ist pure Ignoranz Amazon-Link
 Wenn man verstehen will warum der Linlib-Antam-Virus unsere Freiheit bedroht Baader lesen
Amazon-Link
 Hervorragend. Fragezeichen weglassen!
Amazon-Link
 Wo ist der Kapitalismus geblieben?
Amazon-Link |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
All articles and links, not written by rebellog, are quotations. The articles and links we present in these pages we found at
the time to be interesting. As a matter of principle, we cannot accept any restrictions to links with pages of dubious content. Judgement is left to the responsibility of the visitor.
Any occasional infringement on the
copyright of others is unintentional. Please advise me of such cases by e-mail so that the text or photo in question can be immediately removed. Foreign texts are generally marked by stating the author or the source, provided that the author is known. Such texts are
to be regarded as quotations. If in rare situations pictures or graphics are displayed, they are marked also and should be seen as a meaningful part of the citation. None of the rebellog pages are commercial. (more under
Copyright) |
|
|
|
Hinweis in eigener Sache: Ich empfehle diese Bücher weil ich sie mag. Ich bin nicht an
irgendwelchen Punktesystemen von Amazon beteiligt und bekomme keinen Klick bezahlt!!! |
|
